Below is an article in www.GulfshoreBusiness.com Magazine published April 21, 2021 about the apparent conflicts of interest Commissioner Bill McDaniel has in representing or not representing all the residents of District 5 in Collier County.
Go to www.Gulfshorebusiness.com and read the entire article.
Could We Do Better?
--------------------------------------------------------
The questions comes down to "do you have to own land at the time of a vote to have a conflict of interest?"
County Attorney Klatzkow left this issue open. "Believe" is attorney code for "maybe, maybe not."
Perhaps Commissioner Penny Taylor could request that the newly formed 2020 Naples Ethics Commission could look at this issue as their first case, or
Maybe Collier County Government should have an Ethics Commission............
CLICK HERE FOR INFO
ON NAPLES ETHICS COMMISSION
-------------------------------------------------------------
Collier County Commissioner’s Business Deals Spark Questions of Conflict
by Brett Blackledge, Gulfshore Business Magazine
bjblack35@gmail.com
April 21, 2021
Editor’s Note: This article was produced in partnership with The Florida Center for Government Accountability, a nonprofit legal and journalism program advocating public access to local government.
When William McDaniel ran for Collier County Commission in 2016, he campaigned on his business experience in real estate and as founder of an excavation company. He won the election, despite a history of business problems, including unpaid tax liens, property foreclosures and personal liability for multimillion-dollar business loans.
After taking office, McDaniel’s fortunes changed. He helped set up the sale of his business property to a developer planning a rural village in north-central Collier. The deal erased his obligation to pay $42.7 million owed on two defaulted loans and gave the development crucial access to Immokalee Rd.
Some Collier County residents have questioned McDaniel’s interests in the transaction. The deal allowed Palm Beach County developer Jeff Greene to buy McDaniel’s former excavating company’s land for the Immokalee Road Rural Village plan. New details about the deal and how McDaniel benefitted have renewed those concerns.
McDaniel had a business relationship with Greene before the sale, recommended him as a buyer for his land during the foreclosure negotiations and insisted that his personal responsibility for the
defaulted business loans be erased as part of the deal to quickly sell the Collier land, according to court records and interviews.
In March, McDaniel voted with his fellow commissioners to start the approval process for the Immokalee Road Rural Village project. Commissioners in the coming months will consider changing the county’s growth plan and rezoning the property in the environmentally sensitive rural area for the new homes and businesses promised by Greene.
Critics of the plan argue McDaniel’s connection to the land deal serves at the very least as an example of how some commissioners are too cozy with developers. At worst, McDaniel’s case serves as an example of a commissioner personally benefiting from a development project, some residents argue.
“There’s a huge issue here of quid pro quo,” said Michael Ramsey, president of the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association, which represents the community just south of the planned development.
“They both have interests,” Ramsey said of the developer and McDaniel. “He does have a conflict of interest.”
READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE....
RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES MASTER PLAN ADVISORY MEETINGS
The Rural Golden Gate Master Plan Advisory Committee met in July and August. All meetings from January to June had followed the historical format of a Master Plan Advisory Meeting. Presentations were made by the Rural Estates: growth, economics, infrastructure and density. The Board would discuss and debate the topic and vote on a position. The Advisory Committee of Mark Teaters (chair), Robert Raines (v chair), Bruce Hamels, Kim Ellis, and Michael Ramsey - had established 5 positions by UNANIMOUS vote. Those positions are listed below and are taken word for word from the minutes of the meetings:
01.29.26 MEETING.
NO MOTIONS, First meeting.
02.25.26 MEETING.
ADOPTION of Robert’s Rules of Order
Motion Michael Ramsey made a motion to extend the committee’s duration by an additional year.
Second The motion was seconded by Robert Raines.
Vote The motion passed unanimously.
03.26.26 MEETING.
TOPIC: HOME BASED BUSINESSES AND COMMERCIAL VEHICLE PARKING IN THE RURAL ESTATES
Mike Ramsey made a motion to extend this discussion into additional meetings.
Motion Seconded- Robert Raines
Motion passed unanimously
A second motion was made by Kimberly Ellis to further define commercial vehicles and definition of onsite employee and designated parking space.
Motion Seconded- Bruce Hamels
Mike Ramsey- Suggested a modification of the motion to define all the terms and to look at what other counties have done when implementing this.
Kimberly Ellis- Accepted the modification.
Motion passed unanimously
04.22.26 MEETING.
Mike Ramsey- This committee makes a recommendation that we do not support the contingent redevelopment of the Randall Blvd commercial subdistrict and it should be terminated.
Kimberly Ellis- Seconded.
Motion passed unanimously
Kimberly Ellis- Motion is that we don’t want any future commercial development in Rural Golden Gate Estates.
Robert Raines- Motion Seconded.
Motion passed unanimously
Mike Ramsey-I would like to make a motion to delete transitional conditional use from Rural Golden Gate Estates.
Motion seconded- Robert Raines
Motion passed unanimously
05.18.26 MEETING. WORKSHOP….NO MOTIONS
06.24.26 MEETING. NO MOTIONS…..Chair implemented a Workshop Format. Presentation by Consultant, Presented a Questionnaire / Survey questions to the Audience about Land Use, Commercial Services, & Conditional Uses. Board not allowed to comment or vote.
Chairman Teaters had to APOLOGIZE to the audience and the Committee for sending an email indicating the GGEACA could not submit comments about topics discussed by the committee unless GGEACA submitted meeting minutes for 2026, submitted creation documents, a list of all Board Members and membership. Chairman Teaters was informed by legal that he could not place that requirement on GGEACA.
07.16.26 Received an VERY UNEXPECTED and SUSPICIOUS email from Board member Bruce Hamels:
“From: Bruce Hamels [mailto:b.hamels@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2026 11:06 AM
To: Aaron Zwiefel; Kim Ellis; Michael R. Ramsey; Esq Douglas L. Rankin; Robert Raines
Subject: July 22nd GGER Meeting
It is my understanding that on the next and further meetings that the Commissioners appointed committee members will be asked to join the audience as part of the "Storyboard" members not as advisory committee members as advised to Chairman Mark Teaters via Commissioner Bill McDaniels. Although it is entirely each ones decision whether to not attend the meeting, walk out of the meeting or join into the audience.
Yours truly,
Bruce Hamels
Sent from AOL on Android”
07.22.26 MEETING. Audience set in small groups with, group leaders provided by the Consultant and Collier County Staff leading discussions and recording comments. Topics were: Land Uses in Rural Golden Gate Estates. Board not allowed to comment or vote.
08.26.26 MEETING. Chairman Teaters was advised by County Staff to consider a motion to send all information collected by the Consultant to the Planning Commission. Vote was UNANIMOUS. There was no mention of sending the prior positions voted on as listed above.
Audience set in small groups with, group leaders provided by the Consultant and Collier County Staff leading discussions and recording comments. Topics were: Transportation Network. Board not allowed to comment or vote.
GGEACA tried to make comments to the audience about the issue that by connecting roads and by placement of Emergency Bridges….roads would be reclassified by Staff as “Collector” roads and deserving of Commercial Development, but was shut down.
You can draw your own conclusions, but it appears the District 5 Commissioner is interfering in the process and promoting commercial development. It also appears Sunshine Violations have been committed. The VBX extension will be very bad for the quality of life in the Rural Estates unless the residents fight back.
GGEACA NEEDS YOUR HELP. OUR NEXT MEETING IS 09.16.26.
WE WILL TELL YOU THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON.